Zelenskyy compromises anti-corruption efforts with new law
- Ukrainian lawmakers passed a law affecting the independence of key anti-corruption agencies.
- Protests erupted in several cities as citizens expressed opposition to the law's implications.
- Widespread concern grows over Ukraine's commitment to anti-corruption reforms and international support.
In Ukraine, on July 21, 2025, the Ukrainian Parliament approved a contentious law that imposes restrictions on two major anti-corruption institutions: the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO). This legislation has significant implications, as it limits the independence of these agencies by placing them under the oversight of the Prosecutor General. Critics say this move undermines the reforms established after the 2013-2014 Euromaidan revolution, which aimed to enhance institutional transparency and accountability, essential elements in the fight against corruption in Ukraine. Following the passing of the bill, widespread protests erupted across various cities including Kyiv and Lviv. Citizens expressed their dissatisfaction with the increasing political influence over the anti-corruption bodies, highlighting fears of a rollback in Ukraine's commitment to tackling corruption amid ongoing challenges posed by Russian military aggression. International observers have also voiced concerns about the legislation, which is viewed as a step back for democratic reforms that were hard-won during the recent history of the country. The change in the status of these anti-corruption institutions not only heightens skepticism regarding the Ukrainian government's dedication to combatting corruption but also raises alarms about Ukraine's prospects for integration into the European Union. The European Commission and other Western entities have underscored the importance of these institutions as integral to Ukraine's reform agenda, linking financial assistance and potential EU accession to the country's anti-corruption efforts. Moreover, this shift follows a series of troubling events involving the SBU (State Security Service of Ukraine), which carried out multiple raids targeting NABU officials. Critics argue that these actions indicate an alarming trend towards dismantling Ukraine’s anti-corruption infrastructure. The atmosphere surrounding these developments reveals a society struggling to maintain its commitment to the ideals of transparency, accountability, and the rule of law, especially in light of historical challenges and current external pressures.