ACLU invests $1.3M to inform Montana voters on Supreme Court candidates
- The ACLU plans to spend $1.3 million to educate voters on Supreme Court candidates' positions on abortion and civil rights.
- This investment follows previous partisan attempts to influence the court and reflects growing concerns over judicial independence.
- The ACLU aims to ensure informed voting, as the outcome could significantly impact civil rights in Montana.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is investing $1.3 million in campaign advertising to inform Montana voters about the positions of state Supreme Court candidates on critical issues such as abortion and civil rights. This initiative coincides with a ballot measure aimed at constitutionally protecting abortion access. The ACLU's efforts come in response to previous attempts by Republicans to influence the court's composition, highlighting the increasing politicization of judicial races in the state. The ACLU emphasizes the importance of electing justices who will safeguard fundamental rights amid rising legislative restrictions on abortion and voting. The organization is not endorsing any candidates but aims to ensure voters are well-informed about candidates' stances on significant issues, including marriage equality and Indigenous voting rights. This is particularly crucial as the Montana Supreme Court plays a pivotal role in upholding these rights. The $1.3 million expenditure marks the largest investment by the ACLU in a Montana election, reflecting a broader trend of heightened financial involvement in state Supreme Court races, especially following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Experts note that voters often lack strong preconceptions about candidates in these races, making the ACLU's advertising campaign potentially impactful. As Montana voters prepare for the upcoming election, they will also consider whether to enshrine a 1999 Supreme Court ruling that protects the right to a pre-viability abortion in the state constitution. The outcome of this election could significantly influence the future of civil rights and judicial independence in Montana.