Funding crisis threatens the future of American scientific research
- France Córdova highlights the alarming disinvestment in American scientific research, particularly from the federal government.
- She leads the Science Philanthropy Alliance to enhance private support for basic science but warns it is inadequate without public funding.
- Córdova stresses the essential role of science in economic prosperity and societal well-being, advocating for renewed public investment.
In the United States, France Córdova, a veteran astrophysicist and former Director of the National Science Foundation, addresses the fragility of the country's scientific future. With over four decades of experience in leadership roles including being NASA's Chief Scientist, she now leads the Science Philanthropy Alliance, which focuses on increasing private support for basic scientific research. Córdova highlights the troubling trend of disinvestment by the federal government, which contrasts sharply with the growing initiatives in private philanthropy aimed at bolstering scientific endeavors in America. Córdova's experience has shown her that the federal government's commitment to long-term research funding has diminished, making it increasingly difficult for basic science projects to secure adequate resources. Today, an essentially flat budget would be considered a positive development, evidencing a significant downturn in financial support. Notably, she asserts that even if all private contributions were directed towards offsetting public funding shortfalls, it would still be insufficient to meet the scientific community's needs. This is not a mere budgetary gap; it poses a profound risk to America's competitive edge globally, economic prosperity, public health, and democratic governance. Beyond monetary constraints, Córdova is vocal about the intrinsic value of science, which she believes extends far beyond its economic implications. Science inspires curiosity and facilitates a deeper understanding of humanity and the universe. She recounts how her own journey into science began with her fascination while watching a television program about neutron stars. This sense of wonder is critical, she argues, and should not be overshadowed by a purely utilitarian view of scientific endeavors. Córdova warns that if society reduces science to merely its instrumental benefits, we may forget what originally fuels interest in scientific exploration. In her current role with the Science Philanthropy Alliance, Córdova works to connect donors with institutions that align with their passions, aiming to cultivate a sustainable model of support for scientific research. However, she underscores that even the most effective philanthropic efforts cannot compensate for the absence of robust public funding. Córdova's insights serve as a clarion call for renewed investment in science, emphasizing that the U.S. has historically led in this arena, not by coincidence but through intentional support and investment in research.