Judge closes Prince Harry"s visa drug case in Washington
- Judge Carl Nichols has closed Prince Harry's visa case after reviewing his immigration documents for four months.
- The case was initiated by the Heritage Foundation, which claimed Harry may have lied about his drug use on immigration forms.
- The sealed ruling indicates that the public will likely never see Harry's immigration paperwork, leaving the outcome of the case uncertain.
A judge in Washington has closed the visa case involving Prince Harry after a thorough review of his US immigration documents lasting four months. The case was initiated by the Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank, which alleged that the Duke of Sussex may have provided false information regarding his past drug use on immigration forms. The foundation sought access to Harry's immigration records after the Department of Homeland Security denied their Freedom of Information request. The sealed ruling, issued by Judge Carl Nichols, means that the details of Harry's immigration status and the specifics of the case will likely remain confidential. The judge found the arguments presented by Homeland Security to be insufficiently detailed during a hearing earlier this year, prompting further examination of the documents. The sealed nature of the order raises questions about the implications for both Harry and the Heritage Foundation. Legal experts suggest that the sealing of the order could serve to protect Harry's privacy while also allowing the Department of Homeland Security the opportunity to appeal without public scrutiny. Samuel Dewey, a lawyer for the Heritage Foundation, indicated that the outcome of the case remains unclear, emphasizing that the sealing is not unusual given the unique circumstances surrounding the case. As the situation develops, it is anticipated that a decision will be made public in the coming weeks, although the specifics of the ruling may never be disclosed. This case highlights the complexities of immigration law and the potential ramifications of public figures discussing their past behaviors.