Governor Landry signs new parole laws amid prison overcrowding concerns
- Governor Jeff Landry signed two bills making it harder for prisoners to obtain early parole.
- The new laws require inmates to serve 85% of their sentences before parole hearings and eliminate parole for crimes committed after August 1, 2024.
- Critics warn that these changes will worsen prison overcrowding and increase costs for taxpayers.
In response to rising concerns over prison overcrowding, Governor Jeff Landry has enacted two new laws aimed at tightening parole eligibility for inmates. These laws, signed following a special session on crime, will eliminate parole for individuals committing crimes after August 1, 2024, and require inmates to serve 85% of their sentences before being considered for parole hearings. This shift is intended to deter potential offenders by emphasizing the long-term consequences of criminal behavior. Critics, including Wanda Bertram from the Prison Policy Initiative, argue that these changes will exacerbate the existing overcrowding crisis in Louisiana's prisons. With two out of eight state-run facilities already at full capacity, the new laws are expected to increase the inmate population further, leading to more dysfunction within the correctional system. Bertram warns that the reforms could impose additional financial burdens on taxpayers as the state may need to outsource housing for overflow inmates to local sheriff's departments. The current statistics reveal that several facilities are nearing or at their maximum capacity, with some already experiencing significant overcrowding. This situation raises concerns about the ability of the state to manage its prison population effectively, especially as the new laws come into effect. The potential for increased jail crowding is a pressing issue for sheriffs who are already struggling with their current inmate numbers. Ultimately, while Governor Landry aims to instill fear of the criminal justice system to deter crime, critics contend that removing incentives for rehabilitation may diminish inmates' motivation to reform, potentially leading to a cycle of recidivism and further strain on the state's correctional resources.