Paul Scholes Slams Man United's Disrespect After Ferguson's Contract Termination
- Sir Jim Ratcliffe, co-owner of Manchester United, ended Sir Alex Ferguson's ambassadorial contract in a cost-cutting measure.
- The decision was made in an amicable meeting, but it has drawn criticism for timing and perceived disrespect towards Ferguson's legacy.
- Ferguson remains a non-executive director but faces new limitations at the club, reflecting broader austerity trends under recent ownership.
In a controversial move, Manchester United co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe recently terminated Sir Alex Ferguson's £2.16 million-a-year contract as part of a cost-cutting initiative, a decision that has sparked outrage among fans. Ferguson, an iconic figure in the club’s history, served as manager for 26 years and has been the club's most decorated manager, accumulating 38 trophies. The decision was communicated to Ferguson in a face-to-face meeting that was described as amicable, but the timing of the announcement during a challenging season for United raised concerns about respect for Ferguson’s legacy. While Ferguson will no longer be a paid ambassador, he remains a non-executive director and continues to be part of the club’s culture, although restrictions have been placed on his access to the team’s inner sanctum. This move is seen as emblematic of a broader trend of austerity within the club under new ownership since the acquisition by Ineos earlier this year, which has implemented severe financial cuts. Ferguson’s longstanding contributions to the club, including his global ambassador role, have been significant in maintaining Manchester United's brand and recognition worldwide. Fans and former players, including Paul Scholes, have vocalized their discontent, suggesting that Ferguson deserves better treatment given his contributions over nearly four decades.