US blocks UN cease-fire resolution over lack of Hamas condemnation

On September 19, 2025, the United States vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution aimed at establishing a permanent cease-fire in Gaza and demanding the release of hostages. The resolution was blocked primarily because it failed to sufficiently condemn Hamas, which Washington considers a terrorist organization. The vote revealed a significant divide on the council, with the other 14 member nations supporting the draft. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza remains dire, with reports of extensive casualties and restrictions affecting aid delivery. This was not the first time the U.S. has exercised its veto power in this ongoing conflict, highlighting its stance in favor of Israel's military actions. The draft called for Israel to lift all restrictions on humanitarian aid and to ensure safe distribution to the affected population. As humanitarian conditions deteriorate, the U.N. and other organizations have raised alarms about the suffering in Gaza, where thousands of innocent lives have been lost since hostilities escalated in early October 2023. The ongoing conflict began when Hamas launched an unprecedented attack on Israeli soil, prompting a fierce military response that has since resulted in substantial Palestinian casualties and widespread humanitarian devastation. The U.S. deputy envoy to the Middle East, Morgan Ortagus, articulated the reasons for the veto, emphasizing that the resolution's failure to recognize Israel's right to self-defense and to condemn Hamas' actions left Washington no choice. This position reflects broader attitudes within the U.S. government, which sees Israel as a key ally in a complex geopolitical landscape. Furthermore, the U.S. delegation criticized findings by the U.N.'s Independent International Commission of Inquiry that characterized Israeli actions as genocidal, calling such conclusions slanderous and lacking credibility. As international pressure mounts, Denmark's ambassador at the U.N. expressed hope for continued efforts towards a diplomatic resolution, underscoring that 14 council members communicated a clear message advocating for an immediate cease-fire and enhanced humanitarian access. The U.S. position may alienate its allies, particularly as other nations consider recognizing a Palestinian state, an issue actively pursued by certain members of the U.S. Senate who are pushing for formal recognition. This dynamic complicates the already sensitive negotiations regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, raising questions about future U.S. foreign policy directions and the possibility of a two-state solution amidst escalating tensions.