Michael Gove reveals Treasury blocked action against Grenfell cladding firms
- Michael Gove admitted that successive governments failed to prioritize building safety and respect for social housing tenants.
- In the seven years since the Grenfell fire, some progress has been made, including laws for tenant rights and developer accountability.
- Gove's efforts to restrict unsafe building products were blocked by the Treasury, highlighting ongoing challenges in reforming building safety.
The Grenfell Tower fire, which occurred in June 2017, exposed significant failures in building safety regulations and the treatment of social housing tenants. In the aftermath, Michael Gove acknowledged that successive governments, including his own, had not prioritized building safety adequately. He expressed regret for the slow progress towards justice for the bereaved, relatives, and survivors of the tragedy. Over the past seven years, there have been some improvements, such as enforcing developers to fund the remediation of unsafe buildings and implementing laws to ensure that social housing tenants are treated with respect. Despite these advancements, Gove revealed that his attempts to restrict products from companies like Kingspan, Arconic, and Celotex were hindered by the Treasury's commercial interests. This resistance highlights the ongoing challenges in addressing the systemic issues that contributed to the Grenfell disaster. The Treasury's stance reflects a broader tension between financial considerations and the urgent need for safety reforms in the construction industry. The Grenfell tragedy has served as a catalyst for change, prompting a reevaluation of building safety standards and the responsibilities of developers. However, the slow pace of reform and the obstacles faced by policymakers indicate that much work remains to be done. The commitment to listening to social housing tenants and ensuring their voices are heard is a crucial step towards rebuilding trust and accountability in the system. Ultimately, the Grenfell fire remains a stark reminder of the consequences of neglecting building safety and the importance of prioritizing the welfare of residents in social housing. The journey towards justice and improved safety standards continues, with the hope that lessons learned will prevent future tragedies.