Trump plans to shift $3 billion in grants from Harvard to trade schools

In a recent political move, U.S. President Donald Trump has announced he is contemplating redirecting $3 billion in federal grants previously awarded to Harvard University, with intentions to allocate the funds to trade schools instead. This statement was made on May 25, 2025, through Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. His administration has previously frozen federal research funding to Harvard amidst complaints about the university's hiring practices and ideological leanings, indicating a substantial conflict between the Trump administration and the prestigious Ivy League institution. In addition to freezing funds, Trump’s administration is reportedly set to cancel remaining federal contracts with Harvard, amounting to approximately $100 million. The move stems from a broader campaign by the administration aimed at countering what Trump claims is a liberal bias within elite educational institutions. The administration's actions have prompted Harvard to legally challenge the funding cuts, asserting that they infringe on its constitutional rights and academic independence. Meanwhile, a temporary U.S. court order has blocked the Trump administration from revoking Harvard's ability to enroll international students, providing relief for over 7,000 foreign students previously at risk of being displaced. These actions add to a series of escalating tensions between the White House and American universities, particularly those associated with perceived left-wing ideologies. Trump's criticisms of Harvard have included allegations of anti-Semitism and failure to promote conservative viewpoints, a stance that resonates with his core supporters who believe that many universities exhibit political bias. Such tensions highlight the increasing politicization of academia in the U.S., igniting debates about free speech and educational policies. As the Trump administration continues to intensify its efforts against elite universities, it raises significant questions about the relationship between federal funding and institutional autonomy. The situation not only affects Harvard but could also set precedents for how federal support is distributed to higher education institutions across the country. The cancellation of funds and contracts reflects a broader strategy to impose federal oversight over educational institutions and reshape their agendas to align with the administration's priorities.