Letitia James gains power over NY elections in 2023
- Starting September 22, local governments in New York must seek preclearance from the Attorney General for various election-related decisions.
- This law affects key congressional districts, including those in Long Island, the Hudson Valley, and New York City.
- Critics argue that this change undermines bipartisan election administration and could complicate the electoral process.
A new provision of the state Voting Rights Act, effective September 22, grants the New York Attorney General significant authority over election-related decisions in certain local jurisdictions. This law mandates that local governments must obtain 'preclearance' from the Attorney General or a designated court for various election actions, including moving polling sites or updating voter lists. This shift undermines the traditional bipartisan control of election boards, which has been a hallmark of New York's electoral system. The jurisdictions affected by this law include some of the most competitive congressional districts in the country, particularly in Long Island and the Hudson Valley, as well as New York City and its surrounding counties. Proponents argue that the preclearance requirement will safeguard the voting rights of minority populations, but critics view it as an overreach of power by the Attorney General, Letitia James. The complexity of the new preclearance process raises concerns about its impact on local election administration, potentially leading to confusion and inefficiencies. As the midterm elections approach, the timing of this law could significantly influence key House races, as local Boards of Elections will now face additional hurdles in executing their responsibilities. Overall, the law represents a fundamental change in how elections are managed in New York, with implications for voter confidence and the integrity of the electoral process. The shift towards increased oversight by the Attorney General may not enhance the fairness and efficiency of elections, as intended, but rather complicate the established system that has historically served voters well.