ZOA calls for Jewish community to boycott J Street over arms embargo support

In the United States, the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), the oldest pro-Israel organization, has recently called for Jewish community institutions to take a stand against left-wing J Street due to its support for an arms embargo against Israel. This came after J Street supported a failed resolution in the Senate, which aimed to restrict certain arms sales to Israel during a time of heightened conflict and rising antisemitism. ZOA President Mort Klein criticized these actions as treasonous and dangerous to the safety of Jewish people, stating that blocking arms sales to Israel could lead to increased fatalities among Jews. The controversy centers around J Street's positions in Congress, which often align against the Israeli government's interests. The organization has faced accusations of misrepresenting its funding sources and intentions, particularly regarding its ties to left-wing billionaire George Soros. Critics argue that J Street's support for proactive measures that limit Israel's military capabilities effectively undermines Israel's sovereignty and could encourage violence against it. In light of recent political activities, ZOA has urged local Jewish Community Relations Councils (JCRCs) and Hillels to disaffiliate from J Street and likeminded groups such as Americans for Peace Now, T’ruah, Partners for Progressive Israel, and IfNotNow. They also called for the removal of APN from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. Furthermore, ZOA pressed for the resignations of any rabbis or cantors associated with J Street, framing their support as endangering the future of Israel and the Jewish people. This escalating conflict reflects a broader divide within the American Jewish community regarding how best to support Israel and advocate for peace in the region. The claims made by both sides reveal deep-seated concerns about antisemitism and the proper response to ongoing tensions in Israel. ZOA's urgent plea for a boycott underscores its belief that such positions, viewed as hostile to Israel, require immediate action to maintain a united front in support of Israel's right to defend itself, particularly amid executive and legislative pressures that may jeopardize its security.