Helen Flanagan banned from driving over speeding violations
- Helen Flanagan appeared at Wirral Magistrates' Court for two speeding offences.
- The magistrates imposed a six-month ban and financial penalties despite her claims of hardship.
- Flanagan's case emphasizes the importance of responding to driving offences and the courts' view on hardship claims.
In the UK, former Coronation Street actress Helen Flanagan was disqualified from driving for six months after her Audi was caught speeding on two occasions over a span of just 16 days. This incident took place in June of the previous year, and she appeared at Wirral Magistrates' Court where she faced charges of failing to provide information regarding the identity of the driver. During the court proceedings, Flanagan claimed that it would lead to exceptional hardship due to her responsibilities as a single mother of three children. Flanagan argued that she required her vehicle to transport her children to various activities and groceries, especially given the remote nature of her home in Bolton. She explained that public transport options were limited and that getting around without a car would cause practical difficulties. Despite her arguments, the magistrates were unconvinced that disqualifying her would result in exceptional hardship and upheld the ban while imposing a £2,000 fine, an £800 victim surcharge, and £110 prosecution costs. In court, Flanagan expressed her financial struggles, stating that her income from social media fluctuated and she was not in a position to afford taxis for her children. At 34 years old, she emphasized the challenges she faced as a working single mother, noting that much of her day was dedicated to caring for her children, which could impact her ability to earn a consistent income. Her ex-partner, footballer Scott Sinclair, shares parental responsibilities for their children, but her dependence on a vehicle for errands and childcare duties remained critical to her daily life. The case raised questions about the severity of driving offences and the legal interpretations of hardship in such scenarios. Although she attempted to blame her boyfriend Robbie Talbot for driving at the time of the offences, the courts deemed her failure to respond appropriately to police notices as neglectful. Flanagan offered to pay her penalty in monthly installments but still faced the reality of her driving ban affecting her ability to manage her responsibilities moving forward. The outcome of this legal situation highlights the judicial system's stance on road safety and penalties, emphasizing that the consequences of repeated driving violations can carry serious repercussions, irrespective of individual circumstances.