Nebraska senator rejects Trump’s push to change election law
- Nebraska State Senator Mike McDonnell announced he will not support changes to the state's election law, which awards electoral votes by congressional district.
- The focus is on Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District, crucial for both Trump and Kamala Harris in the upcoming election.
- McDonnell's decision reflects a commitment to maintaining the current electoral system and protecting the voice of Nebraska voters.
A significant setback occurred for Donald Trump and his Republican allies as Nebraska State Senator Mike McDonnell announced he would not support efforts to change the state's election law. This law, in place for 30 years, awards electoral votes by congressional district rather than a winner-take-all system. McDonnell, who recently switched from the Democratic Party to the GOP, emphasized that now is not the time for such a change, just 43 days before the election. In his statement, McDonnell expressed that the decision should rest with Nebraska voters rather than politicians. He thanked constituents for their engagement in the democratic process and highlighted the independent spirit of Nebraskans. The focus of the electoral battle is particularly on Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District, known as Omaha's blue dot, which has become crucial for both Trump and Kamala Harris in the upcoming election. Trump's campaign has been concerned about securing all five of Nebraska's electoral votes, especially after losing one to Joe Biden in 2020. The Harris campaign is actively working to reclaim that electoral vote, investing heavily in grassroots efforts in Omaha. Despite pressure from Trump, McDonnell's refusal to support a change in the electoral law indicates a strong commitment to maintaining the current system. Governor Jim Pillen has indicated a willingness to convene a special session to discuss potential changes, but only if there is sufficient support. McDonnell's stance appears to close the door on any changes this election cycle, reflecting a broader sentiment of protecting the electoral process from external influences.