Sudanese rebels perpetrate atrocities during siege of El Fasher

In Sudan, a civil war has led to a severe humanitarian crisis, particularly evident in the city of El Fasher, which has been besieged for 500 days by the rebel group known as the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Since the outbreak of hostilities in April 2023, tensions stemming from the ousting of President Omar al-Bashir in 2019 have escalated into open conflict between the RSF and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF). The fighting has reportedly resulted in significant civilian casualties and displacement, with estimates indicating that between 13 million and 15 million people have been uprooted from their homes amidst the ongoing conflict. Human rights organizations and an Independent International Fact-Finding Mission reported numerous instances of heinous acts committed by the RSF, which include murder, torture, forced displacement, and sexual violence. The mission asserted that the RSF has even resorted to using starvation as a method of warfare, effectively trying to starve the residents of El Fasher to death. The blockade of humanitarian aid has further exacerbated the suffering of the hundreds of thousands of civilians trapped in the city. As of August 29, 2025, United Nations spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric indicated that efforts to deliver supplies to El Fasher are consistently obstructed, underscoring the dire situation for those within the besieged city. Reports also indicate that the military tactics employed by the RSF mimic those seen in other regions, involving the construction of barriers meant to confine civilians and reduce their escape options. Satellite imagery has shown evidence of a wall being erected to entrap the population, which highlights the ruthless strategies employed by the rebel group in their consolidation of power. If El Fasher were to fall, it is believed that the RSF would gain control over nearly the entirety of Darfur, along with its lucrative resources, particularly gold mines. This scenario raises serious concerns about the prospect of worsening conditions for civilians across Sudan. The international response has included statements from the U.S. government, which has expressed growing concern regarding the situation in Sudan. The U.S. State Department's comments suggest a hardening stance on the warring parties involved. There is recognition of the need to protect fundamental freedoms in Sudan, including religious ones, while also addressing the influences of foreign actors, such as Iran and Russia, on the conflict. Diplomatic efforts continue but seem to be met with challenges, highlighting the complexity of the situation, which remains tenuous at best.