Jul 10, 2024, 4:40 PM
Jul 10, 2024, 4:40 PM

Twisters: A Lackluster Sequel to a Classic Disaster Film

Subjective
Highlights
  • The sequel to Twisters offers thrilling weather sequences yet lacks a substantial plot.
  • Critics have noted that the film features bland characters who repeat a predictable pattern.
  • Despite the presence of charismatic actors, the movie fails to engage its audience emotionally.
Story

The new film *Twisters*, while featuring a cast of charismatic actors and thrilling sequences, suffers from a significant lack of plot depth. Much like its predecessor, the film revolves around bland characters repeatedly driving into severe weather conditions. The narrative primarily follows a team led by Daisy Edgar-Jones, who, along with her crew, chases tornadoes across picturesque Oklahoma, often shouting, "Where is it?" This repetitive structure detracts from the potential for character development and engaging storytelling. A notable aspect of *Twisters* is the introduction of a rival team led by a charming cowboy, played by Glen Powell. Initially portrayed as a superficial character focused on promoting his YouTube channel, there are hints that he may possess a deeper, more scientific side. However, the film's attempt to innovate with a plot device involving the use of absorbent materials from disposable nappies to weaken tornadoes feels absurd and lacks the respect owed to the original film's legacy. Directed by Lee Isaac Chung, known for the acclaimed *Minari*, *Twisters* ultimately falls short of its predecessor in several key areas. The absence of iconic elements, such as Eddie Van Halen's memorable guitar riffs and the whimsical imagery of cows being tossed by tornadoes, leaves a void. While the film delivers thrilling sequences, they often feel misplaced, lacking the narrative context that would elevate them. In conclusion, *Twisters* offers a visually engaging experience but fails to provide the depth and innovation expected from a modern blockbuster. A more daring approach might have explored the underlying causes of extreme weather rather than relying on spectacle alone.

Opinions

You've reached the end