PETA stirs controversy by asking pub to change its name

In Birmingham, England, an animal rights group known as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has sparked debate following its request to the owners of a local pub, The Sly Old Fox, to consider changing the establishment’s name. PETA made this appeal, arguing the term 'sly' is derogatory and contributes to the negative perception of foxes. Elisa Allen, a representative from PETA, suggested replacing 'sly' with 'clever' instead. She highlighted that foxes are often unfairly labeled as pests due to societal attitudes reinforced by negative language. The request has drawn mixed reactions on social media, with some finding it unreasonably trivializes broader animal rights issues while others support the initiative for language reform. Critics have expressed their concerns, stating that PETA's focus on a pub's name distracts from more pressing animal rights matters. Allen defended the suggestion, countering that critics were overreacting and should consider how terminologies influence public perception of animals. PETA’s intention in urging the pub owners for a name change is rooted in the belief that language shapes attitudes towards animal welfare. Allen's position argues that rebranding can foster respect and admiration for foxes while also positively affecting their treatment in wider society. Additionally, she offered to help cover any costs the pub might incur to facilitate this rebranding initiative. The dynamic that PETA's letter has created might serve as a pivotal moment in the ongoing dialogue surrounding animal rights, language, and how society engages with these concepts. As the BBC reached out to the pub for comments, the conversation continues to develop around the implications of such requests and their impact on animal rights advocacy.