Why Kamala Harris Threatens Constitutional Values in 2024

In the United States, concerns have grown regarding the potential constitutional implications of Kamala Harris's policies and actions as a presidential candidate. Critics argue that she poses risks to various amendments of the Constitution, especially the First Amendment, which guarantees freedoms such as speech and religion. Her previous stances against religious exemptions for medical professionals performing abortions have raised alarms about government overreach into personal beliefs. Furthermore, advocates of parental rights have expressed apprehension towards developments initiated by the Biden-Harris administration, which they say undermine parental authority, particularly in matters concerning children's identities. Moreover, Harris's record as a prosecutor is under scrutiny, with claims that she has historically favored radical reforms that might compromise public safety. While her approach aligns with progressive values, opponents contend that her actions have occasionally demonstrated a lack of due process, as evidenced by her defense of convictions obtained through misconduct. Critics have also noted her contentious treatment of and allegations against judges and political opponents, including Supreme Court nominees. Overall, there is a consistent theme of fear among her opponents regarding the preservation of constitutional freedoms, particularly involving rights related to religion, expression, and parental authority. These fears reflect broader concerns tied to her progressive policies, which have been perceived as harmful to American civil liberties. As electoral campaigns unfold, these arguments are likely to intensify and shape public discourse leading up to the elections.