Jul 3, 2025, 12:00 AM
Jul 2, 2025, 6:55 PM

Faculty at University of Denver express no confidence in Chancellor Haefner

Provocative
Highlights
  • A significant majority of participating faculty, 56%, voted in favor of the no-confidence motion against Chancellor Jeremy Haefner.
  • The vote was prompted by concerns over financial management, governance, and the university's strategic direction.
  • Despite the faculty's vote, the Board of Trustees continues to express unwavering support for Chancellor Haefner.
Story

In June 2023, faculty at the University of Denver conducted a vote of no confidence in Chancellor Jeremy Haefner after a series of concerns regarding his leadership. The vote took place over a two-week period from June 12 to June 26, with approximately 70% of the eligible full-time faculty participating. Of those who voted, 56% expressed no confidence in Haefner, while 37% voted against the motion and 7% abstained. This motion stemmed from grievances related to financial management, shared governance, and the strategic vision for the university. The Faculty Senate had previously supported a no-confidence motion, which highlighted the faculty's dissatisfaction with Haefner's leadership style and financial priorities. In response to the vote, university spokesman Jon Stone stated the board of trustees continues to support Haefner, emphasizing their commitment to work collaboratively with faculty, staff, and students. Despite the faculty's expressed concerns, the board affirmed its confidence in Haefner, citing the need for strong leadership during challenging times in higher education. The situation has been complex, as tensions over financial constraints and the university's future direction have contributed to a divisive atmosphere on campus. Former Faculty Senate President Dean Saitta resigned from his position prior to the no-confidence vote, indicating his concerns about the ongoing division among faculty and the strategic direction under Haefner's leadership. He noted that unity is essential when facing external challenges to university autonomy. Overall, the no-confidence vote indicates significant faculty unrest, reflecting broader trends in higher education related to leadership discontent amid budget cuts and declining enrollment.

Opinions

You've reached the end