U.N. assembly supports two-state solution for Israel-Palestine conflict

On September 13, 2025, in the United Nations, the U.N. General Assembly voted overwhelmingly to endorse a resolution supporting a two-state solution to the long-standing Israel-Palestinian conflict. The vote, which saw 142 nations in favor and only 10 against, was a significant diplomatic effort sparked by recent escalations in violence and humanitarian crises in Gaza. The resolution specifically urges Israel to commit to recognizing a Palestinian state, a proposition that current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected vehemently, stating that 'there will be no Palestinian state.' This vote took place amidst rising tensions following an all-out offensive by Israel in Gaza that had begun in October 2023, following a deadly attack carried out by Hamas. The violence has resulted in substantial casualties, with reports indicating over 64,000 Palestinians, mostly civilians, killed since the escalation of hostilities. As of now, about 47 hostages taken during the Hamas attack remain in Gaza. The humanitarian conditions in the region have deteriorated dramatically, leading the U.N. to declare famine in different parts of Gaza. The resolution approved by the General Assembly outlines a phased plan to end the nearly 80-year conflict, indicating several steps towards achieving peace and stability. Notably, it emphasizes the necessity for Hamas to relinquish control in Gaza, so the Palestinian Authority can govern and administer the territory effectively. Moreover, the initiative supports the deployment of a temporary international stabilization mission tasked with monitoring these transitions and protecting civilians. Despite the overwhelming support from the General Assembly, the resolution is non-binding, and reactions have varied widely. Israel's U.N. ambassador condemned the resolution, calling it a misrepresentation and arguing that it inadvertently benefits Hamas. The United States government echoed similar sentiments, decrying the resolution as ill-timed and counterproductive. They asserted that it undermines ongoing diplomatic efforts and might exacerbate tensions further. Overall, the General Assembly's resolution represents a crucial moment in international diplomatic efforts aimed at addressing longstanding grievances but faces significant challenges ahead amidst entrenched positions from key stakeholders.