Title: Criticism of Kamala Harris's Stance on Abortion and Human Rights
- Lila Rose criticizes Kamala Harris for her stance on abortion and human rights.
- Harris is accused of using her power to target journalists and promote abortion.
- The clash between Rose and Harris highlights a contentious issue in politics.
In a recent commentary, concerns have been raised regarding Vice President Kamala Harris's commitment to protecting the human rights of vulnerable Americans, particularly in the context of abortion. Critics argue that Harris has aligned herself with the abortion industry, which they claim profits from the termination of unborn children, undermining the fundamental right to life. This perspective positions her as the administration's "abortion czar," with expectations that she will enhance the Democratic Party's messaging on the issue. The commentary highlights a specific legislative action from 2015, when then-Governor Jerry Brown signed a law mandating pro-life and faith-based pregnancy centers to provide information about abortion, even if it conflicted with their religious beliefs. Harris, who co-sponsored this law, is criticized for prioritizing abortion access over the rights of those who oppose it on moral grounds. This incident is cited as an example of her perceived disregard for free speech and religious freedom. The author emphasizes that the right to life and equal protection under the law should be guaranteed from the moment of fertilization, arguing that these principles are foundational to American democracy. They express concern that if Harris were to ascend to the presidency, her track record suggests she would continue to undermine these rights. In conclusion, the commentary warns that Harris's potential presidency could further erode the rights of those advocating for the most vulnerable in society, reflecting a broader apprehension about her approach to human rights and free speech.