Ant Middleton banned for unpaid taxes exceeding £1 million
- Ant Middleton and Emilie Middleton failed to pay over £1 million in taxes owed by their company.
- The couple withdrew millions from the company while neglecting their tax obligations.
- Their disqualification as company directors illustrates the serious consequences of corporate mismanagement.
In the United Kingdom, TV personality and former soldier Ant Middleton, alongside his wife Emilie, faced severe consequences for failing to pay over £1 million in taxes owed by their company. Their business, Sway and Starting Limited, went into liquidation in late 2022 after the couple withdrew approximately £3 million in loans while neglecting their tax obligations. An investigation by the Government's Insolvency Service revealed that between 2019 and 2022, the couple failed to pay VAT and corporation tax amounting to a total of £1,254,000. Importantly, the business had sufficient income, totaling over £4.5 million, during that period, indicating an ability to fulfill its tax responsibilities. The Insolvency Service highlighted the couple's legal and financial duties as directors to ensure that taxes were paid. However, despite taking substantial funds from their company during times of financial distress, they failed to meet these responsibilities to the government, leading to their disqualification. The repercussions of their actions are not taken lightly, as the Insolvency Service made it clear that such behavior should serve as a warning to other company directors about the risks of neglecting tax payments. Following the liquidation, Ant Middleton reached an agreement with the liquidator to repay £300,000 of the loans; however, he initially struggled to comply with the payment plan and ultimately decided to sell their home to meet the remaining obligations. This news comes in light of Middleton's controversial departure from the reality TV show SAS: Who Dares Wins due to what Channel 4 described as personal conduct issues and inappropriate comments made to staff members. Although he expressed intentions to support political movements such as Reform UK, his professional future remains uncertain as a result of these events. The combination of significant tax liabilities and their rapid financial withdrawals from the company raises ethical questions about corporate governance practices and accountability among directors. The actions of the Middletons exemplify the critical importance of compliance with fiscal responsibilities, both as a matter of law and as part of the ethical framework expected in business leadership.