Trump plans to remove over 100 EPA workers amid controversy

In early February 2025, it was reported that Donald Trump intends to put over 100 workers from the Environmental Protection Agency's environmental justice division on paid leave. This decision comes in the wake of Trump's executive order aimed at reducing diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives within federal agencies. Notably, this follows ongoing efforts by the Trump administration to downsize the federal workforce, including measures to terminate recent hires. The EPA spokesperson emphasized that the goal is to create a more efficient government that serves all Americans while maintaining transparency in the process. Simultaneously, there has been significant public discourse regarding Ed Martin, the acting U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, who publicly extended an offer of protection to employees of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) amidst controversy related to a 'DEI Watch List.' This list targeted federal workers involved in diversity initiatives, primarily affecting Black employees. Critics have condemned the list, viewing it as a substantial risk to the safety and well-being of the individuals named. Despite Martin's outreach, there has been notable silence regarding the threats posed to those on the DEI list, raising concerns about a perceived bias in the application of law and order. Former federal prosecutors have criticized this disparity as morally indefensible and have urged the Justice Department to investigate any related threats. The current situation paints a complex picture of the Trump administration's broader strategy regarding federal workforce management and the evolving discourse on diversity initiatives. With the executive order aimed at cutting DEI programs, the ramifications may extend beyond the EPA, signaling a more profound shift in federal employment policies. The proposed actions against EPA workers suggest a targeted approach that aligns with Trump's vision to streamline government departments while challenging existing diversity frameworks. This strategy could have far-reaching implications for civil rights and environmental justice within the federal government as it seeks to progress through these significant changes.