Blake Lively's deposition postponed amid ongoing legal feud with Justin Baldoni

In the United States, the ongoing legal dispute between actress Blake Lively and actor Justin Baldoni has garnered significant media attention. Recently, on July 16, 2025, a notice was sent to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the postponement of Lively's scheduled deposition from July 17 to July 31. This request was made following the dismissal of Jed Wallace from the case, who had been involved as a crisis mitigation consultant for Baldoni. Lively claims that Wallace was hired to damage her reputation, leading to a complex legal scenario involving accusations of harassment and retaliation. The postponement was agreed upon by both teams to allow for further legal foresight after a significant ruling earlier in the month. Judge Lewis J. Liman ruled in favor of Lively by dismissing Baldoni's $400 million defamation countersuit. The suit hinged on claims of reputational damage and was dismissed due to findings that Lively’s harassment allegations were protected against defamation claims. The decision came in light of allegations made by Lively that Baldoni attempted to undermine her creatively on the film set of 'It Ends With Us', which has become the centerpiece of the ongoing disputes between the two actors. Lively's original legal claims were lodged back in December 2024, and the trial is now scheduled for March 2026. The documentary titled 'Lively vs Baldoni: The Hollywood Feud' is set to premiere on Discovery+, detailing the timeline of events, from initial harassment claims to the ongoing legal feuds and various public perceptions of the situation. This case not only reflects personal grievances but also highlights issues surrounding the power dynamics in Hollywood, particularly when it comes to allegations of harassment and the consequences actors face in public perception following such claims. As the legal wrangling continues, the nature of these allegations has sparked discussions about the treatment of actors and the repercussions of public contracts made under duress, setting the stage for significant public interest in this unfolding story.