Trump administration kills $766 million funding for bird flu vaccine over safety concerns
- The Trump administration canceled a $766 million contract with Moderna for a bird flu vaccine citing safety and scientific concerns.
- Despite promising clinical trial results, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services found the mRNA vaccine not scientifically sound or safe enough.
- The funding withdrawal reflects broader hesitance towards mRNA technology and its integration into public health initiatives.
In 2020, amidst the ongoing pandemic, the Trump administration made a significant decision to cancel a $766 million funding contract with Moderna, aimed at the development of a bird flu vaccine. This funding was intended to support the late-stage development and procurement of bird flu vaccines, but the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services concluded that the vaccine did not meet required safety and scientific standards. Despite the promising early results from clinical trials, the concerns regarding the mRNA technology's safety were deemed serious enough to halt further investment. Moreover, this cancellation also included a previously awarded $176 million grant for an mRNA-based vaccine against H5N1 avian influenza, reflecting a broader unease about the newer vaccine technologies in the public health domain. Moderna's mRNA-1018 technology had shown a rapid and potent immune response during early clinical trials with over 300 adult volunteers participating. However, officials from HHS emphasized that the decision to withdraw support was not solely about the vaccine's efficacy but encompassed ethical considerations and ensuring public trust. HHS Communications Director Andrew Nixon pointed out that mRNA technology was still under-tested, and the government did not want to repeat what they believed were prior mistakes made by the previous administration, which had reportedly concealed legitimate safety concerns from the public. In the aftermath of this funding cancellation, Moderna expressed its intent to seek alternative paths to continue developing its H5N1 vaccine, which aimed to address the current strains of bird flu circulating among animals. The subsequent Biden administration, however, later awarded a $590 million contract to Moderna to further develop its bird flu vaccine and expand clinical trials to prepare for potential future pandemics. This indicated a shift in approach from the previous administration, focusing again on mRNA technology, despite previous skepticism. At the center of the vaccine debate was an influential figure: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who was active during the Trump administration and had made various statements regarding vaccine science and safety concerns. He declared himself the final authority on vaccine matters and initiated several changes that sidelined traditional practices. This included a move to limit the new Covid boosters and discourage the inclusion of mRNA technology in vaccine development processes. His controversial stance added complexity to the vaccine discussion during a critical public health crisis. The effects of the Trump administration’s decision to cancel funding for Moderna were far-reaching, impacting the trajectory of vaccine development, public health policies, and trust in vaccine efficacy, especially at a time when the world was grappling with COVID-19. The dual narratives regarding the safety of mRNA vaccines and their role in future pandemic preparedness continue to shape discussions in the health community today.