Katie Hobbs vetoes bill to block Chinese land ownership near military bases
- Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed a bill aimed at limiting Chinese land ownership near military bases in Arizona.
- The veto has drawn significant criticism from state lawmakers who argue it jeopardizes national security.
- The decision highlights the ongoing debate about foreign investment in strategic areas and its implications for safety.
In Arizona, Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs faced backlash after she vetoed Senate Bill 1109 in early 2025. This bill sought to prevent the Chinese government from holding a 30% or greater stake in any state property, specifically targeting land adjacent to military bases. The legislation was sponsored by GOP State Senator Janae Shamp, who argued that it was essential for protecting national security and preventing espionage from the Chinese Communist Party. The veto came at a time when concerns about foreign ownership of land, particularly by China, were rising nationwide, as other states were already enacting similar restrictions. Opponents of the veto expressed outrage, claiming that Hobbs failed to act in the interest of national security. Shamp described the veto as politically motivated, calling it 'utterly insane' for not safeguarding citizens from perceived threats. Proponents of the bill highlighted recent attempts by Chinese entities to lease property near strategic military sites, including Luke Air Force Base, which hosts important fighter pilot training. Critics of the governor’s decision suggested it effectively signaled an open invitation to the Chinese government to gain a foothold near these crucial assets. During her defense, Hobbs claimed that the bill lacked effectiveness in countering espionage efforts and cited concerns over arbitrary enforcement. Despite the amendments made to address initial compliance issues, she stated that they did not provide sufficient clarity on the implementation criteria. The political divide surrounding this veto reflects broader national conversations about how best to manage foreign investments and protect national security. This situation is not unique to Arizona, as at least 27 other states were reportedly considering legislation to restrict foreign land ownership. National lawmakers were also examining various bills aimed at curtailing such investments, highlighting the growing consensus around the potential dangers posed by foreign access to sensitive sites. As Governor Hobbs faces criticism and potential pressure for the legislature to override her veto, the ongoing debate continues to underscore the complexities of balancing foreign investments with national security interests.