Topic overview
Briefly
- Hasan Piker previously appeared on ABC in September to discuss Charlie Kirk's assassination.
- ABC previously faced criticism for interviewing Steve Bannon but was cleared of policy breaches.
- Piker told the Guardian he loves when his enemies hate him and dismissed right-wing criticism.
What happened
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) is preparing to broadcast a new episode of its Planet America program on Monday night, August 17, 2026, featuring leftwing commentator Hasan Piker. The program's return coincides with the intensifying US midterm elections. Piker, a prominent online streamer who broadcasts nearly daily for up to eight hours, has cultivated a substantial following, particularly among young men, through his discussions on American foreign policy, capitalism, LGBTQ+ rights, and his criticism of the Democratic establishment. He characterizes himself as a 'megaphone' amplifying frustrations with establishment liberalism rather than a change-maker himself. His opinions are unfiltered and occasionally extreme, and while he denies being antisemitic, he is strongly opposed to Zionism and Israel's policies regarding the war in Gaza and Palestinians.
The decision to feature Piker has provoked significant criticism from Australian conservative circles. News Corp's News24 host James Morrow expressed deep criticism of the interview on Friday, questioning whether there was 'something in the water at the ABC's Ultimo HQ that makes them think they are immune to consequences.' The ABC has received formal complaints about Piker's appearance. This is not the first time the broadcaster has faced scrutiny over guest selection; previously, an interview with Trump kingmaker Steve Bannon during the US president's first administration also drew criticism. While the ABC ombudsman found no breach of editorial policies in that instance, the broadcaster acknowledged it fell short of community expectations and committed to changing its editorial guidance.
Planet America host Barron has mounted a vigorous defense of the decision to interview Piker. He urged critics to watch the segment before passing judgment and expressed a lack of surprise that 'some of the usual suspects are outraged, OUTRAGED, that we would even speak to Piker.' Barron justified the booking by emphasizing Piker's relevance to the 2026 US election, describing him as a central figure in the political landscape. He drew a parallel to his previous willingness to interview Sean Hannity about his role in the 2012 election, framing both decisions as matters of relevance. Barron stated on social media platform X that the program selects guests of all political stripes based on interest and relevance, and that Piker's position in American politics has become more significant due to the surge in progressive Democrats.
The controversy surrounding Piker's ABC appearance reflects broader tensions in media representation and political discourse. Piker has been heralded as a modern-day kingmaker for progressive Democrats, wielding influence through his extensive online presence. His previous ABC appearance in September focused on the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Piker himself has expressed indifference to criticism from the right, telling the Guardian in December that he loves when his enemies hate him and dismissing their attacks as inconsequential. The situation highlights ongoing debates about media balance, the boundaries of acceptable political commentary, and the role of public broadcasters in providing platforms to controversial figures during election periods.

Comprehensive report
Full story,
in detail.
Trace the developments that led here, see how the story evolved, and understand the forces and wider context surrounding it.
